Inside 847 Production Clinical AI Notes
Official Schedule Context
- Date/time: 2026-07-01 · 2:50pm-3:10pm
- Track/room: AI Architects: AI Factories · Leadership 2
- Speaker(s): Sebastian Fox
- Session type/status: session · confirmed
Official Description
A Series B clinical AI company had an ambient scribe in production for six months. Internal evals
passed every release. A clinical team spot-checked a sample weekly and saw nothing alarming. The
system had healthy NPS, expanding deployments, and the company was preparing for European market
expansion. We ran a structured audit on 847 production notes. Found 127 failures across six
categories. 23 were severity-critical - the kind that could directly alter a clinical decision. The
team's existing LLM-as-judge had reported zero failures across the same notes. This talk is the
engineering forensics of that audit. The audit setup: which production traces we sampled, how the
structured failure-mode coding worked, and the reviewer protocol. The results: three dominant
failure clusters - decision-status corruption (19 cases), structured omissions (34 cases), and
dosage substitution (12 cases) - and the underlying generation pattern behind each. For each cluster
I will show: a real anonymised trace, the eval rule that should have caught it but did not, an
explanation of why the eval missed it, and the criterion that does catch it. The pattern that
emerged in the data is engineering-actionable. The team had built a 20-criterion content-
faithfulness eval layer. The failures lived underneath it, in a missing intent layer. We replaced
the broad content layer with a five-criterion intent layer (decision status, omission impact, dosage
integrity, diagnostic chain, laterality consistency). Detection rate went from 0% to 96% on the
failure set. Compute cost dropped because the intent layer is cheaper to run than the content layer
it replaced. You will leave with a forensics protocol for auditing your own production AI, the five
intent criteria that generalise to any high-stakes domain, and the architectural pattern: build a
thin intent layer, not a thick content layer.
Related YouTube Video
No related AI Engineer channel video found yet.
Transcript Status
No official session recording transcript was found by exact title match on the AI Engineer YouTube channel during this run.
People
Notes
- Pending transcript synthesis when an official recording or confirmed matching video is available.