Slides: We Cut 94% of AI Coding Tokens With a Local Code Index - Rajkumar Sakthivel, Tesco

Source Video

We Cut 94% of AI Coding Tokens With a Local Code Index - Rajkumar Sakthivel, Tesco

Relationship To World's Fair 2026

These slides are extracted from a public AI Engineer YouTube video connected to World's Fair 2026. Speaker-matched clips are supporting context unless later confirmed as exact session recordings; official livestream recordings are day-level/event-level source material.

Related Scheduled Sessions

Extracted Slides

slide-001.jpg

OCR text:

AIENGINEERWORLD'SFAIR

June30-July2,2026-SanFrancisco

SEARCH&RETRIEVAL TRACK

We Cut 94% of Our Al Coding Tokens

With a Local Code Index

Here's the architecture.

0.4ms

Token Reduction

Search Latency

Recall@10

RajkumarSakthivel

RS

github.com/elara-labs/code-

context-engine

slide-002.jpg

OCR text:

Every Al coding tool we tried had the same assumption:

send as much context as possible.

sw \2)2)

| i“

slide-003.jpg

OCR text:

We optimized the model. We should have optimized the

eet a> 4

@ A retrieval layer between codebase and agent 4»

t

slide-004.jpg

OCR text:

Where your tokens actually go

< | Output compression

XO,

= ~8% off total bill

Input retrieval

= ~61% off total bill

@ 1 .

slide-005.jpg

OCR text:

A local retrieval layer between codebase and agent

Bic ibeCitg Hybrid Poin g Code Confidence

Chunking Retrieval Compression Graph TorLitils]

10 langs 94% a Tica

slide-006.jpg

OCR text:

Why not just vector search?

Ss re a

Vector Search FTS5 (BM25) RRF Fusion

res cree,

Neither retriever is good enough alone. Together they cover each other's blind spots. a

slide-007.jpg

OCR text:

The hardest problem wasn't retrieval. It was knowing when

retrieval was -

Confidence scoring blend

@ Simple heuristic won

slide-008.jpg

OCR text:

BENCHMARK

FastAPI

FastAPl:53files,20realquestions,reproducible

Full file baseline

83,681 tok/q

Afterretrieval

4,927tok/q

retrieval savings

After compression

523tok/q

No cherry-picking.No synthetic queries.

20questionsadeveloperwouldactuallyask

Recall@10

$pythonbenchmarks/run_benchmark.py

--repo fastapi/fastapi--source-dirfa

elara-labs/code-context-engine

slide-009.jpg

OCR text:

TRADE-OFFS

i

What we're honest about

94% is against full-file reads Monorepos dilute recall

Embedding model matters What actually worked

: )

slide-010.jpg

OCR text:

KEY TAKEAWAY

MEASURABLE

Everytokentracked.Everydollarcounted.

my-project.247queries.Last query5mago

90088xtokensaved

Input savings

12.4M

tokens

Output savings

48.2k

tokens

Total saved

12.4M

tokens

Breakdown:

retrieval

10.4H $156.00

chunk conpression

421.5k

48.2k

nates.Actual tokens served vs full

LDo

costs from live modelpricing

Thank you·Rajkumar Sakthivel

slide-011.jpg

OCR text:

The biggest optimization in Al coding

isn't the model. [t's the context.

SA local a

Bese) Try it now

ae

Slide-Derived Subjects To Review

Subject extraction uses video title, related session titles/descriptions, transcript context, and OCR text when available. OCR is best-effort and should be reviewed against the embedded slide images.